REVIEW ON “LEAN ON ME(1989)”

  REVIEW ON “LEAN ON ME(1989)”


NAME: Jayashree M                                                   REG. NO: 2022510040     

DEPT: Information Technology                                  BRANCH: AI & DS

DATE: 03/03/2024                                                                 SEMESTER: 04/08

SUBJECT: Film Appreciation                                     SUB. CODE: HU5274







Released in 1989, "Lean on Me" draws us into the world of urban schooling and stirs up a powerful mixture of ambition, desperation, and moral dilemmas. Through the eyes of Joe Clark (Morgan Freeman), a principal infamous for his unconventional and frequently contentious tactics, the movie sparks a discussion on the difficulties of educational change and the human cost that can occasionally be associated with it.


Freeman did a fantastic job in capturing the complexity of Clark's personality. He portrays the subtle elements of fragility and self-doubt that simmer beneath the surface, in addition to the unwavering resolve and commanding presence that drive him ahead. Instead of depicting Clark as a one-dimensional figure, this comprehensive picture provides an insight into the inner tensions that probably drive his unusual methods. Although the movie purposefully stays away from going too much into Clark's past, these small clues give his persona a greater depth and fascination while also making the spectator consider the ethical issues raised by his actions.


Some critics might argue that by concentrating only on Clark's cause, the movie marginalizes the viewpoints of other characters and pupils. On closer inspection, though, one finds a more complex tapestry with a variety of voices. In the movie, teachers like Mr. Darris (Robert Guillaume) and Mrs. Elliott (Beverly Todd) struggle to implement their unique teaching methods within the constraints of the current system. Students like Thomas (Michael Wright), in a similar vein, show the range of experiences within the student body and the difficulties and opportunities they provide. Through the integration of these diverse perspectives into the storyline, the movie illustrates how Clark's leadership has an impact on not only him but also the entire school community.


It doesn't sugarcoat the unpleasant facts about Clark's working techniques. The movie shows how his unconventional methods—like metal detectors and longer school days—raise outcomes of tests, but it doesn't minimize the human cost. We saw the uneasiness, even fear, that some teachers and pupils felt under Clark's rule. This unapologetic depiction compels us to consider the moral consequences of these practices and consider the possible tradeoff between individual freedoms and academic achievement.


To conclude with, I would say that this movie forces us to look at the systemic injustices in the educational system, the particular difficulties inner-city schools face, the complexity of leadership, and the possible costs associated with achieving meaningful reform. Even if the movie's portrayal of Clark may cause some controversy, in the end it acts as a catalyst for critical thinking and fosters a greater comprehension of the problems and potential solutions confronting education in the future. We can get closer to identifying solutions that meet the requirements of all students without risking their rights or wellbeing by discussing the film's complexities and encouraging ongoing discussions.




CHARACTER REVIEW:

  1. Joe Clark (Morgan Freeman):


  • Strengths: Unwavering determination, strong leadership, dedication to student success.

  • Weaknesses: Authoritarian tendencies, disregard for due process, lack of empathy at times.

  • Impact: Raised test scores, improves school environment, but at the cost of individual liberties and fostering a culture of fear.

  • Complexity: Freeman's portrayal captures both Clark's strengths and weaknesses, leaving the audience conflicted and questioning his methods.



  1. Mrs. Elliott (Beverly Todd):

  • Strengths: Dedicated teacher, compassionate towards students, advocates for alternative approaches.

  • Weaknesses: Feels powerless within the system, struggles to reach all students.

  • Impact: Represents the challenges faced by many educators in inner-city schools, highlighting the need for broader systemic changes.

  • Complexity: Offers a counterpoint to Clark's methods, showcasing the importance of human connection and compassion in education.



  1. Mr. Darris (Robert Guillaume):

  • Strengths: Experienced teacher, skeptical of Clark's methods, emphasizes critical thinking and individual potential.

  • Weaknesses: Initially resistant to change, can be dismissive of Clark's concerns.

  • Impact: Represents the voice of experienced educators questioning Clark's unconventional approach while highlighting the importance of fostering critical thinking skills.

  • Complexity: Adds depth to the film's portrayal of educators, showcasing diverse perspectives within the teaching community.


  1. Thomas (Michael Wright):

  • Strengths: Intelligent and resourceful student, caught between wanting to succeed and the pressures of his environment.

  • Weaknesses: Initially involved in drug dealing, struggles to trust authority figures.

  • Impact: Represents the potential of the student body, highlighting both their challenges and their ability to overcome them with support and guidance.

  • Complexity: Offers a glimpse into the struggles faced by many students in inner-city schools, showcasing their potential and the need for individual attention.





There's no point in dwelling on the past. 

You gotta keep moving forward.

                                            -Mr.Darris


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MY OPINIONS AND REVIEWS OF LEAN ON ME Movie

Lean On Me Review